applicable weight 80%
yndx-a-koptsov/palindrome
Language: JavaScript
branch main
mirror
Just a simple palindrome library
Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 80%analysed 17 September 2026 at 19:00 UTC — not all categories measured
What the 100 is made of
category weightDocumentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10
The light segment — Security: will appear with a member token, while the rest share its weight for now.
Six categories
earned / weightDocumentation and best practices11.7 / 25
scored
Project activity5.1 / 25
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 50%0–9.4 / 18.8
partial
Issues1.7 / 18.8
scored
Code health12.5 / 12.5
scored
States:weight goes to the restinterval, not zero
scored
partial
no data
collection failed
Not measured: CI runswill become a group once access opens
closed by the platform
Strengths
what's already done- Almost no marked debt in the code
- The license file is in place
- Dependency versions are pinned
What affected the score
Penalties
Documentation and best practices
- −3README1,261 chars, no quickstart
- −3tests directorymissing
- −3docs directorymissing
- −3Dockerfilemissing
- −1contributing guidemissing
- −<1share of short commit messages — 17%
Project activity
- −4top author's share of commits — 100%
- −4unique authors — 1 author
- −4last release — 553 days
- −4last commit — 356 days
- −2weekly activity — 2 weeks
- −1commits in the last year — 6 commits
CI/CD
- −9SourceCraft CI configurationmissing
Issues
- −17age of open issues — 497 days1 issue
Not measured — interval width
Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full
CI/CD
- up to −9CI runsdata not collected
What will raise the score
by strength of impact- work through the stale open issuesage of open issues — 497 dayswhy: an outside contributor gets an answer, and their work is not lostevidence: the repository's issue list, snapshot of 8 October 2026+17Issues
- add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CISourceCraft CI configurationwhy: the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code+9CI/CD
- share the work with other contributorstop author's share of commits — 100%why: the work does not rest on a single person+4Activity
- bring in a second maintainer+4
- publish a release or tag a version+4
- make a commit soon+4
- add a quickstart section to the README+3
- write tests for the project+3
- write project documentation+3
- containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+3
- spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+2
- commit more often+1
- add a contributing guide+1
- write meaningful commit messages+<1