applicable weight 70%
nphne-q2d4wqgu/sourcecraft-test
branch main
Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 70%analysed 17 September 2026 at 19:00 UTC — not all categories measured
What the 100 is made of
category weightDocumentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10
The light segments — Security: will appear with a member token; Code health. The rest share their weight for now.
Six categories
earned / weightDocumentation and best practices3.1 / 28.6
scored
Project activity7.1 / 28.6
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 50%0–10.7 / 21.4
partial
Issues2.3 / 21.4
scored
Code health
no data
States:weight goes to the restinterval, not zero
scored
partial
no data
collection failed
Not measured: CI runswill become a group once access opens
closed by the platform
Strengths
what's already done- Contributions are spread across authors
What affected the score
Penalties
Documentation and best practices
- −6README18 chars, no quickstart
- −3license filemissing
- −3tests directorymissing
- −3docs directorymissing
- −3Dockerfilemissing
- −3dependency lockfilemissing
- −3review policyno protection
- −1contributing guidemissing
- −1branch protection policyno protection
- −1share of short commit messages — 50%
Project activity
- −5last commit — 489 days
- −5commits in the last year — 0 commits
- −5weekly activity — 0 weeks
- −5last releaseno releases or version tags
- −2unique authors — 2 authors
CI/CD
- −11SourceCraft CI configurationmissing
Issues
- −19age of open issues — 489 days1 issue
Not measured — interval width
Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full
CI/CD
- up to −11CI runsdata not collected
What will raise the score
by strength of impact- work through the stale open issuesage of open issues — 489 dayswhy: an outside contributor gets an answer, and their work is not lostevidence: the repository's issue list, snapshot of 8 October 2026+19Issues
- add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CISourceCraft CI configurationwhy: the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code+11CI/CD
- add a quickstart section to the READMEREADMEwhy: a newcomer can tell how to run the project and where to lookevidence: file README.md, snapshot of 8 October 2026+6Documentation
- make a commit soon+5
- commit more often+5
- spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+5
- publish a release or tag a version+5
- add a license file+3
- write tests for the project+3
- write project documentation+3
- containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+3
- add a dependency lockfile+3
- set up a review policy+3
- bring in a second maintainer+2
- add a contributing guide+1
- set up a branch protection policy+1
- write meaningful commit messages+1