applicable weight 80%
juwain/hc-private-probe
Language: JavaScript
branch main
Приватный репозиторий-проба для приёмки Repo Health Score: проверка, что данные закрытого репозитория не попадают на публичную поверхность
Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 80%analysed 28 September 2026 at 21:52 UTC — not all categories measured
What the 100 is made of
category weightDocumentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10
The light segment — Security: will appear with a member token, while the rest share its weight for now.
Six categories
earned / weightDocumentation and best practices16.4 / 25
scored
Project activity17.5 / 25
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 60%11.3–18.8 / 18.8
partial
Issues18.8 / 18.8
scored
Code health12.5 / 12.5
scored
States:weight goes to the restinterval, not zero
scored
partial
no data
collection failed
Not measured: CI runswill become a group once access opens
closed by the platform
Strengths
what's already done- Open issues do not pile up (10 days)
- Almost no marked debt in the code
- SourceCraft CI is configured
- The README introduces the project
- Commits are fresh (11 days)
What affected the score
Penalties
Documentation and best practices
- −2docs directorymissing
- −2Dockerfilemissing
- −2review policyno protection
- −1branch protection policyno protection
- −<1share of short commit messages — 25%
Project activity
- −2unique authors — 2 authors
- −2commits in the last year — 4 commits
- −2weekly activity — 2 weeks
- −2top author's share of commits — 75%
Not measured — interval width
Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full
CI/CD
- up to −8CI runsdata not collected
What will raise the score
by strength of impact- write project documentationdocs directorywhy: a newcomer can tell how to run the project and where to look+2Documentation
- containerize the project — add a DockerfileDockerfilewhy: a newcomer can tell how to run the project and where to look+2Documentation
- set up a review policyreview policywhy: a change is reviewed, and the history stays readable+2Documentation
- bring in a second maintainer+2
- commit more often+2
- spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+2
- share the work with other contributors+2
- set up a branch protection policy+1
- write meaningful commit messages+<1