Skip to the main content
The Repo Vitals mark: a pulse that ends in a commitREPO VITALS

applicable weight 70%

imbok/libimt

Language: Julia
branch master

Программная библиотека для работы с Единой моделью данных ИМ

Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 70%analysed 17 September 2026 at 22:40 UTC — not all categories measured

What the 100 is made of

category weight
Documentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10

The light segments — Security: will appear with a member token; Code health. The rest share their weight for now.

Six categories

earned / weight
Documentation and best practices
13 / 28.6
scored
Project activity
3 / 28.6
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 50%
0–10.7 / 21.4
partial
Issues
9.5 / 21.4
scored
Code health
no data
States:
scored
partial
no data
weight goes to the rest
collection failed
interval, not zero
Not measured: CI runs
closed by the platform
will become a group once access opens

Strengths

what's already done
  • The license file is in place
  • Documentation has its own directory
  • A contributor guide is in place
  • Commit messages are meaningful

What affected the score

Penalties

Documentation and best practices

  • −3
    README2,923 chars, no quickstart
  • −3
    tests directorymissing
  • −3
    Dockerfilemissing
  • −3
    dependency lockfilemissing
  • −3
    review policyno protection
  • −1
    branch protection policyno protection
  • −<1
    share of short commit messages — 4%

Project activity

  • −5
    last commit — 1,018 days
  • −5
    commits in the last year — 0 commits
  • −5
    weekly activity — 0 weeks
  • −5
    last releaseno releases or version tags
  • −4
    top author's share of commits — 96%
  • −2
    unique authors — 2 authors

CI/CD

  • −11
    SourceCraft CI configurationmissing

Issues

  • −11
    share of unanswered issues — 100%sample: 5 of 10
  • −1
    age of open issues — 71 days5 issues

Not measured — interval width

Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full

CI/CD

  • up to −11
    CI runsdata not collected

What will raise the score

by strength of impact
  • CI/CD
    +11
    add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CISourceCraft CI configurationwhy: the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code
  • Issues
    +11
    respond to issuesshare of unanswered issues — 100%why: an outside contributor gets an answer, and their work is not lostevidence: the repository's issue list, snapshot of 8 October 2026
  • Activity
    +5
    make a commit soonlast commit — 1,018 dayswhy: the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned
  • commit more often+5
  • spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+5
  • publish a release or tag a version+5
  • share the work with other contributors+4
  • add a quickstart section to the README+3
  • write tests for the project+3
  • containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+3
  • add a dependency lockfile+3
  • set up a review policy+3
  • bring in a second maintainer+2
  • set up a branch protection policy+1
  • work through the stale open issues+1
  • write meaningful commit messages+<1