Skip to the main content
The Repo Vitals mark: a pulse that ends in a commitREPO VITALS

applicable weight 65%

dimflix-official/valentine-from-a-programmer

Language: Python
branch master
imported from GitHub

😍😏 She doesn't stand a chance.

Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 65%analysed 17 September 2026 at 18:42 UTC — not all categories measured

What the 100 is made of

category weight
Documentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10

The light segments — Security: will appear with a member token; Issues: the tracker is empty or not set up. The rest share their weight for now.

Six categories

earned / weight
Documentation and best practicessignal coverage 71%
3.8–12.6 / 30.8
partial
Project activity
7.3 / 30.8
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 50%
0–11.5 / 23.1
partial
Issuesthe tracker is empty or not set up
no data
Code health
15.4 / 15.4
scored
States:
scored
partial
no data
weight goes to the rest
collection failed
interval, not zero
Not measured: CI runs
closed by the platform
will become a group once access opens
Not measured: README
couldn't see it
the platform's window was truncated: a deep file or a recent version may have fallen outside it

Strengths

what's already done
  • Almost no marked debt in the code
  • Contributions are spread across authors
  • The license file is in place

What affected the score

Penalties

Documentation and best practices

  • −3
    tests directorymissing
  • −3
    docs directorymissing
  • −3
    Dockerfilemissing
  • −3
    dependency lockfilemissing
  • −3
    review policyno protection
  • −1
    contributing guidemissing
  • −1
    branch protection policyno protection
  • −1
    share of short commit messages — 38%

Project activity

  • −5
    last commit — 898 days
  • −5
    commits in the last year — 0 commits
  • −5
    weekly activity — 0 weeks
  • −5
    last release — 966 days
  • −3
    unique authors — 2 authors
  • −<1
    top author's share of commits — 54%

CI/CD

  • −12
    SourceCraft CI configurationmissing

Not measured — interval width

Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full

Documentation and best practices

  • up to −9
    READMEdata not collected

CI/CD

  • up to −12
    CI runsdata not collected

What will raise the score

by strength of impact
  • CI/CD
    +12
    add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CISourceCraft CI configurationwhy: the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code
  • Activity
    +5
    make a commit soonlast commit — 898 dayswhy: the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned
  • Activity
    +5
    commit more oftencommits in the last year — 0 commitswhy: the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned
  • spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+5
  • publish a release or tag a version+5
  • write tests for the project+3
  • write project documentation+3
  • containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+3
  • add a dependency lockfile+3
  • set up a review policy+3
  • bring in a second maintainer+3
  • add a contributing guide+1
  • set up a branch protection policy+1
  • write meaningful commit messages+1
  • share the work with other contributors+<1