applicable weight 80%
covvex/shareform
Language: JavaScript
branch main
Простой способ делится данными для заполнения форм
Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 80%analysed 17 September 2026 at 19:11 UTC — not all categories measured
What the 100 is made of
category weightDocumentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10
The light segment — Security: will appear with a member token, while the rest share its weight for now.
Six categories
earned / weightDocumentation and best practices9.8 / 25
scored
Project activity16.6 / 25
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 60%0–7.5 / 18.8
partial
Issues5 / 18.8
scored
Code health12.5 / 12.5
scored
States:weight goes to the restinterval, not zero
scored
partial
no data
collection failed
Not measured: CI runswill become a group once access opens
closed by the platform
Strengths
what's already done- Almost no marked debt in the code
- The license file is in place
- Documentation has its own directory
What affected the score
Penalties
Documentation and best practices
- −3README300 chars, no quickstart
- −2tests directorymissing
- −2Dockerfilemissing
- −2dependency lockfilemissing
- −2review policyno protection
- −1contributing guidemissing
- −1branch protection policyno protection
- −<1share of short commit messages — 36%
Project activity
- −4last releaseno releases or version tags
- −1weekly activity — 3 weeks
- −1top author's share of commits — 67%
- −1unique authors — 3 authors
- −<1last commit — 68 days
- −<1commits in the last year — 18 commits
CI/CD
- −8SourceCraft CI configurationmissing
- −4CI configuration contents
Issues
- −8share of unanswered issues — 100%sample: 6 of 10
- −5age of open issues — 353 days19 issues
- −1issue resolution time — 7 days19 issues
Not measured — interval width
Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full
CI/CD
- up to −8CI runsdata not collected
What will raise the score
by strength of impact- add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CISourceCraft CI configurationwhy: the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code+8CI/CD
- respond to issuesshare of unanswered issues — 100%why: an outside contributor gets an answer, and their work is not lostevidence: the repository's issue list, snapshot of 8 October 2026+8Issues
- work through the stale open issuesage of open issues — 353 dayswhy: an outside contributor gets an answer, and their work is not lostevidence: the repository's issue list, snapshot of 8 October 2026+5Issues
- publish a release or tag a version+4
- run CI on pull requests, not only on pushes to the default branch+4
- add a quickstart section to the README+3
- write tests for the project+2
- containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+2
- add a dependency lockfile+2
- set up a review policy+2
- close issues faster+1
- spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+1
- add a contributing guide+1
- set up a branch protection policy+1
- share the work with other contributors+1
- bring in a second maintainer+1
- make a commit soon+<1
- commit more often+<1
- write meaningful commit messages+<1