applicable weight 80%
altman/source-craft-review
Language: JavaScript
branch main
Open on SourceCraftDownload report (Markdown)snapshot 8 October 2026signal coverage 80%analysed 17 September 2026 at 22:24 UTC — not all categories measured
What the 100 is made of
category weightDocumentation 20Activity 20Security 20CI/CD 15Issues 15Code health 10
The light segment — Security: will appear with a member token, while the rest share its weight for now.
Six categories
earned / weightDocumentation and best practices4.5 / 25
scored
Project activity5.5 / 25
scored
Securitywill appear with a member token
no data
CI/CDsignal coverage 60%9.8–17.3 / 18.8
partial
Issues15.3 / 18.8
scored
Code health12.5 / 12.5
scored
States:weight goes to the restinterval, not zero
scored
partial
no data
collection failed
Not measured: CI runswill become a group once access opens
closed by the platform
Strengths
what's already done- Almost no marked debt in the code
- SourceCraft CI is configured
- Dependency versions are pinned
What affected the score
Penalties
Documentation and best practices
- −5README54 chars, no quickstart
- −2license filemissing
- −2tests directorymissing
- −2docs directorymissing
- −2Dockerfilemissing
- −2review policyno protection
- −1contributing guidemissing
- −1branch protection policyno protection
- −1share of short commit messages — 100%
Project activity
- −4top author's share of commits — 100%
- −4unique authors — 1 author
- −4last releaseno releases or version tags
- −3commits in the last year — 1 commit
- −3weekly activity — 1 week
- −1last commit — 104 days
CI/CD
- −2CI configuration contents
Issues
- −3age of open issues — 96 days1 issue
Not measured — interval width
Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full
CI/CD
- up to −8CI runsdata not collected
What will raise the score
by strength of impact- add a quickstart section to the READMEREADMEwhy: a newcomer can tell how to run the project and where to lookevidence: file README.md, snapshot of 8 October 2026+5Documentation
- share the work with other contributorstop author's share of commits — 100%why: the work does not rest on a single person+4Activity
- bring in a second maintainerunique authors — 1 authorwhy: the work does not rest on a single person+4Activity
- publish a release or tag a version+4
- work through the stale open issues+3
- commit more often+3
- spread work across more weeks instead of bursts+3
- add a license file+2
- write tests for the project+2
- write project documentation+2
- containerize the project — add a Dockerfile+2
- set up a review policy+2
- run CI on pull requests, not only on pushes to the default branch+2
- add a contributing guide+1
- set up a branch protection policy+1
- write meaningful commit messages+1
- make a commit soon+1