# doser-compose/titanit-profdnk

- Platform link: https://sourcecraft.dev/doser-compose/titanit-profdnk
- Modifiers: imported from GitHub
- Snapshot date: 2026-10-08
- Generated at: 2026-10-09 10:24 UTC

## Score

**32–64** (F–C — starting point–not bad), applicable weight 65%.

## Categories

| Category | Weight (nominal / applied) | State | Score | Coverage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Documentation and best practices | 20 / 30.77 | partial | 51.43–65.71 | 86% |
| CI/CD | 15 / 23.08 | partial | 0–50 | 50% |
| Security | 20 / 0 | no data | – | 0% |
| Project activity | 20 / 30.77 | scored | 53.86 | 100% |
| Issues | 15 / 0 | no data | – | 0% |
| Code health | 10 / 15.38 | collection failed | 0–100 | 0% |

## Strengths

- **README** (Documentation and best practices): earned 8.79 of 8.79
- **top author's share of commits** (Project activity): earned 5.13 of 5.13
- **commits in the last year** (Project activity): earned 4.75 of 5.13
- **tests directory** (Documentation and best practices): earned 2.93 of 2.93
- **docs directory** (Documentation and best practices): earned 2.93 of 2.93

## Recommendations

- **add a SourceCraft CI configuration (.sourcecraft/ci.yaml); the service does not see external CI** [critical] (CI/CD) — SourceCraft CI configuration, may return up to +11.54 (the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code)
- **publish a release or tag a version** [critical] (Project activity) — last release, may return up to +5.13 (the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code)
- **spread work across more weeks instead of bursts** [medium] (Project activity) — weekly activity, may return up to +3.59 (the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned)
- **add a license file** [medium] (Documentation and best practices) — license file, may return up to +2.93 (the terms of use are stated, not guessed)
- **add a dependency lockfile** [medium] (Documentation and best practices) — dependency lockfile, may return up to +2.93 (the build and the checks are reproducible for whoever takes the code)
- **set up a review policy** [medium] (Documentation and best practices) — review policy, may return up to +2.93 (a change is reviewed, and the history stays readable)
- **bring in a second maintainer** [medium] (Project activity) — unique authors, may return up to +2.56 (the work does not rest on a single person)
- **make a commit soon** [medium] (Project activity) — last commit, may return up to +2.54 (the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned)
- **set up a branch protection policy** [optional] (Documentation and best practices) — branch protection policy, may return up to +1.47 (a change is reviewed, and the history stays readable)
- **commit more often** [optional] (Project activity) — commits in the last year, may return up to +0.38 (the repository shows it is alive, not abandoned)
- **write meaningful commit messages** [optional] (Documentation and best practices) — share of short commit messages, may return up to +0.29 (a change is reviewed, and the history stays readable)

## Not measured — interval width

Not a penalty: the lower bound of the score counts the metric as zero, the upper bound as full.

- **Documentation and best practices** — partial
  - Dockerfile: up to −2.93 — the platform returned incomplete data — the value could not be determined
  - contributing guide: up to −1.47 — the platform returned incomplete data — the value could not be determined
- **CI/CD** — partial
  - CI runs: up to −11.54 — access to the source is closed
- **Code health** — collection failed
  - TODO/FIXME density: up to −15.38 — the platform returned incomplete data — the value could not be determined

## Not counted in the score, and why

- **Security** — no data
  - the basis was not saved: there was nothing to measure, or the reason was not recorded in the snapshot
- **Issues** — no data
  - the basis was not saved: there was nothing to measure, or the reason was not recorded in the snapshot